Series is what happens when kids are told that they can do anything they put their minds to. Two DEI hires with unsubstantiated egos, leftist ideaology, and $3.1M in funding. Somehow, Nathaniel and Sean have grifted so hard that they managed to swindle the "most venture capital raised by current Ivy League students." A few problems here.

Keeping in line with tradition, starting with founders. The red flags are always there, it just takes a bit of effort to recognize them, and a whole lot of retardation to ignore them. Here's a few highlights. Sean started as a consultant(womp womp), before going through Antler, another red flag. Nathaniel started Bullmont. Enough said. Furthermore, both founders are deeply untechnical. Not the team you want to be building in AI consumer social. The product, as of 4/14/2025, reeks of vibe coding. I haven't yet tried to break it, but it seems like it'll crack pretty easily.

product

No writing is necessary for this section. Here's something fun.

“We're 6'5”, Black, and technical - a direct foil to the Harvard story. And that difference is the reason Series tells a new story of how people connect online.” -Source

"If I am approaching a girl, I'm not going to tell her, 'Well, I'm okay, but there are a lot of hot guys out there as well,'" Hargrow says. "I'm going to find a way to ethically tell her I'm the best guy ever." -Source

"The year I was born, in 2004 as my comment in Yale Daily News suggests, we let an egotistical psycopath, that had no real friends, father what we call "social media"." -Source

"Hopefully in the next few decades, we'll be like 50 or something and we'll be looking back and saying Harvard did it wrong in '04, and Yale did it right in 2025," -Source

"Consumer social" wouldn't be a concept without daddy zuck. What is this slander of literally THE consumer social guy? As a consumer social founder with no traction too? Literally :skull: emoji.

4/14/2025